Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting Consumer Brand Sabotage virality: a study of an Indian brand #boycott

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Information Systems and e-Business Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on negative brand relationships has gained traction over the years. However, most of this research has focussed on the cases involving product or service failure by a firm, leaving conflicts arising as a result of values and ethics espoused by a firm relatively unexplored. In this research, we focus on one such case and explore the factors that influence virality of social media content in the context of Consumer Brand Sabotage (CBS). Based on a week of Twitter data pertaining to specific hashtags associated with a brand’s sabotage, we explore how tweet related attributes affect the potential for amplification of the tweets related to the event. We categorize the factors as informational, interactional, and creator specific, and build machine learning (ML) models to predict the retweet likelihood of CBS tweets. We find that while informational factors associated with the tweets (such as, hashtags, URLs and emotions) are important to predict the diffusion of CBS-related tweets, this was not the case for interactional factors (such as, reply, like, quote, etc.). For creator factors, we found that considering the number of followers of the creator in the ML models reduced the predictability of diffusion of CBS-related tweets, and found verified accounts to be of little importance as well. We discuss the implications of these findings for practice and research, and present scope for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Research has tried to explicate various aspects of consumer-brand engagement including its various antecedents and consequences (Gómez et al. 2019; Algharabat et al. 2020).

  2. See https://www.nytimes.com/1995/06/17/world/oil-companies-face-boycott-over-sinking-of-rig.html.

  3. The traditional word of mouth literature has long noted the negative effects of negative word of mouth such as its influence on consumer judgements (Herr et al. 1991).

  4. See https://www.adgully.com/tanishq-launched-the-ekatvam-campaign-to-start-off-the-festive-season-98116.html.

  5. See: https://www.timesnownews.com/india/article/after-internet-backlash-tanishq-pulls-plug-on-latest-ad-the-controversy-around-ekatvam-explained/666883.

  6. See https://www.india.com/news/india/tanishq-store-attacked-by-mob-in-gujarats-gandhidham-manager-made-to-write-apology-note-4172760/.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Vimalkumar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhatia, R., Gupta, A., Vimalkumar, M. et al. Factors affecting Consumer Brand Sabotage virality: a study of an Indian brand #boycott. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-023-00628-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-023-00628-0

Keywords

Navigation