当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Periodontol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Ultrasound‐based jawbone surface quality evaluation after alveolar ridge preservation
Journal of Periodontology ( IF 4.3 ) Pub Date : 2024-05-14 , DOI: 10.1002/jper.23-0370
Amanda B. Rodriguez 1 , Oliver D. Kripfgans 2 , Kenneth M. Kozloff 3, 4 , Ankita Samal 2 , Jae‐man Woo 2 , Mostafa Shehabeldin 1 , Hsun‐Liang Chan 1
Affiliation  

BackgroundBone readiness for implant placement is typically evaluated by bone quality/density on 2‐dimensional radiographs and cone beam computed tomography at an arbitrary time between 3 and 6 months after tooth extraction and alveolar ridge preservation (ARP). The aim of this study is to investigate if high‐frequency ultrasound (US) can classify bone readiness in humans, using micro‐CT as a reference standard to obtain bone mineral density (BMD) and bone volume fraction (BVTV) of healed sockets receiving ARP in humans.MethodsA total of 27 bone cores were harvested during the implant surgery from 24 patients who received prior extraction with ARP. US images were taken immediately before the implant surgery at a site co‐registered with the tissue biopsy collection location, made possible with a specially designed guide, and then classified into 3 tiers using B‐mode image criteria (1) favorable, (2) questionable, and (3) unfavorable. Bone mineral density (hydroxyapatite) and BVTV were obtained from micro‐CT as the gold standard.ResultsHydroxyapatite and BVTV were evaluated within the projected US slice plane and thresholded to favorable (>2200 mg/cm3; >0.45 mm3/mm3), questionable (1500–2200 mg/cm3; 0.4–0.45 mm3/mm3), and unfavorable (<1500 mg/cm3; <0.4 mm3/mm3). The present US B‐mode classification inversely scales with BMD. Regression analysis showed a significant relation between US classification and BMD as well as BVTV. T‐test analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between US reader scores and the gold standard. When comparing Tier 1 with the combination of Tier 2 and 3, US achieved a significant group differentiation relative to mean BMD (p = 0.004, true positive 66.7%, false positive 0%, true negative 100%, false negative 33.3%, specificity 100%, sensitivity 66.7%, receiver operating characteristics area under the curve 0.86). Similar results were found between US‐derived tiers and BVTV.ConclusionPreliminary data suggest US could classify jawbone surface quality that correlates with BMD/BVTV and serve as the basis for future development of US‐based socket healing evaluation after ARP.

中文翻译:

牙槽嵴保存后基于超声的颌骨表面质量评估

背景种植体植入的骨准备情况通常通过拔牙和牙槽嵴保留 (ARP) 后 3 至 6 个月内任意时间的二维放射线照片和锥形束计算机断层扫描的骨质量/密度来评估。本研究的目的是调查高频超声 (US) 是否可以对人类的骨准备情况进行分类,使用显微 CT 作为参考标准,获得接受治疗的愈合窝的骨矿物质密度 (BMD) 和骨体积分数 (BVTV)人体中的 ARP。方法在植入手术期间,从 24 名之前接受过 ARP 提取的患者身上采集了总共 27 个骨芯。在植入手术前立即在与组织活检采集位置共同注册的部位拍摄超声图像,通过专门设计的导板实现,然后使用 B 模式图像标准将其分为 3 层(1)有利,(2)有问题的,以及 (3) 不利的。骨矿物质密度(羟基磷灰石)和 BVTV 通过显微 CT 获得,作为金标准。结果在投影的 US 切片平面内评估羟基磷灰石和 BVTV,并将阈值设置为有利(>2200 mg/cm2)3; >0.45毫米3/毫米3),有疑问(1500–2200 mg/cm3; 0.4–0.45 毫米3/毫米3)和不利(<1500 mg/cm3; <0.4毫米3/毫米3)。目前的美国 B 型分类与 BMD 成反比。回归分析显示US分类与BMD以及BVTV之间存在显着关系。 T 检验分析表明美国读者分数与黄金标准之间存在显着相关性。当将方法 1 与方法 2 和方法 3 的组合进行比较时,US 相对于平均 BMD 实现了显着的群体分化(p= 0.004,真阳性 66.7%,假阳性 0%,真阴性 100%,假阴性 33.3%,特异性 100%,敏感性 66.7%,受试者工作特征曲线下面积 0.86)。在 US 衍生的等级和 BVTV 之间也发现了类似的结果。结论初步数据表明 US 可以对与 BMD/BVTV 相关的颌骨表面质量进行分类,并作为 ARP 后基于 US 的牙槽窝愈合评估的未来发展的基础。
更新日期:2024-05-14
down
wechat
bug