A multiplicity of issues impact upon post-conflict economic recovery, one of which is land policy. Depending on the policy adopted, it could promote post-conflict economic growth, but it could also hinder the economy. This study reviews post-conflict economics and land conceptually and analyses the effect of land policy on post-conflict economic recovery in South Korea. Conceptually, post-conflict economy and land are interrelated in terms of security of land tenure, the land market, land (taxation) reform and revenue. Land tenure is secured through land reform in post-conflict situations. Security of land tenure stabilises and revitalises the land market, which leads to an increase in land tax. In addition, land taxation reform provokes an increase in land tax, and land tenure needs to be secured to maximise land tax collection through land taxation reform. The revenue collected through revitalisation of the land market and land taxation reform is utilised to stimulate post-conflict economic recovery. However, the South Korean case is not completely in line with the conceptual relationship. First, land taxation reform in South Korea resulted in an increase in public revenue, and the government was able to spend this revenue in supporting the war and partially stimulating post-conflict economic recovery. On the other hand, land tax reform could promote post-conflict economic recovery at the national level, while at the same time causing poverty at the individual level. Second, the South Korean case suggests that the foundation for the land market was laid during the post-conflict period and an increase in revenue through the revitalisation of the land market mainly contributed to economic development after the post-conflict period. In South Korea, land taxation reform had been more important than the land market for post-conflict economic recovery.

中文翻译：

---

1948 年至 1960 年代初韩国冲突后经济复苏和土地政策

冲突后经济复苏受到多种问题的影响，其中之一就是土地政策。根据所采取的政策，它可以促进冲突后经济增长，但也可能阻碍经济。本研究从概念上回顾了冲突后经济和土地，并分析了土地政策对韩国冲突后经济复苏的影响。从概念上讲，冲突后经济和土地在土地保有权安全、土地市场、土地（税收）改革和收入方面是相互关联的。冲突后局势中的土地保有权通过土地改革得到保障。土地保有权的保障稳定并振兴了土地市场，从而导致土地税的增加。此外，土地税改革导致土地税增加，需要确保土地保有权，以通过土地税改革最大限度地征收土地税。通过振兴土地市场和土地税改革获得的收入用于刺激冲突后经济复苏。但韩国的案例并不完全符合概念关系。首先，韩国的土地税改革导致公共收入增加，政府能够将这些收入用于支持战争并部分刺激冲突后经济复苏。另一方面，土地税改革可以促进国家层面的冲突后经济复苏，同时造成个人层面的贫困。其次，韩国的案例表明，土地市场的基础是在冲突后时期奠定的，通过振兴土地市场而增加的收入主要促进了冲突后时期的经济发展。在韩国，对于冲突后经济复苏而言，土地税改革比土地市场更为重要。