This study uses a computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software approach with the help of the NVivo v.12 software. The approach is used to obtain an overview of members’ views on the collaboration of customary land certification programs and factors determining failure in achieving a common objective process. In general, the findings show that collaboration programs fail, and members have a negative view of collaboration programs, namely the law infringement, conflict, and hidden agenda. The conflict between indigenous and leadership interests is referred to as a determination of the common objective bias of collaborative programs. The interpretation is that the collaboration on customary land certification programs is taken as a means of politicizing indigenous peoples to maintain power at the regional level. In addition, there are regional counter-regulations with the central government, giving rise to uncertainty about recognizing indigenous peoples in the regions. This study criticizes several previous studies that saw that the success of the collaboration process was largely determined by the strength of leadership in influencing members so that one vision was achieved, but this study found other aspects of abuse of power authority.

中文翻译：

---

为什么共同目标在执行协同治理方案时出现偏差？印度尼西亚达雅克案例

本研究在 NVivo v.12 软件的帮助下使用计算机辅助定性数据分析软件方法。该方法用于总体了解成员对习惯土地认证计划合作的看法以及决定未能实现共同目标过程的因素。总体而言，调查结果表明合作项目失败，成员对合作项目持负面看法，即违法、冲突和隐藏议程。本土利益和领导层利益之间的冲突被称为合作项目的共同客观偏见的确定。解释是，传统土地认证计划的合作被视为将土著人民政治化以维持区域一级权力的一种手段。此外，中央政府还存在地区反规定，导致承认该地区原住民存在不确定性。这项研究批评了之前的几项研究，这些研究认为合作过程的成功很大程度上取决于影响成员的领导力，从而实现一个愿景，但这项研究发现了滥用权力的其他方面。