当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Optimizing treatment expectations and decision making through informed consent for psychotherapy: A randomized controlled trial.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology ( IF 7.156 ) Pub Date : 2023-11-16 , DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000851
Leonie Gerke 1 , Franz Pauls 1 , Sönke Ladwig 1 , Sarah Liebherz 2 , Klaus Michael Reininger 3 , Levente Kriston 2 , Manuel Trachsel 4 , Martin Härter 2 , Yvonne Nestoriuc 1
Affiliation  

OBJECTIVE The objective of this research was to determine the efficacy and safety of an optimized informed consent (OIC) consultation for psychotherapy. METHOD We performed a randomized controlled superiority online trial involving 2 weeks of treatment and 3 months of follow-up. One hundred twenty-two adults with mental disorders confirmed by structured interview currently neither in out- nor inpatient psychotherapy (mean age: 32, gender identity: 51.6% female, 1.6% diverse), were randomized. Participants received an information brochure about psychotherapy for self-study (treatment as usual [TAU]; n = 61) or TAU plus a one-session OIC utilizing expectation management, contextualization, framing, and shared decision making (n = 61). The primary outcome was treatment expectations at 2-week follow-up. RESULTS At 2-week follow-up, participants receiving OIC showed more positive treatment expectations compared to those receiving TAU only (mean difference: 0.70, 95% CI [0.36, 1.04]) with a medium effect size (d = 0.73). Likewise, OIC positively influenced motivation (d = 0.74) and adherence intention (d = 0.46). OIC entailed large effects on reduction of decisional conflict (d = 0.91) and increase of knowledge (d = 0.93). Participants receiving OIC showed higher capacity to consent to treatment (d = 0.63) and higher satisfaction with received information (d = 1.34) compared to TAU. No statistically significant group differences resulted for expected adverse effects of psychotherapy. Results were maintained at 3-month follow-up. Data sets for n = 10 cases (8.2%) were missing (postassessment n = 4, 2-week n = 6, 3-month follow-up n = 8). CONCLUSIONS Explaining to patients how psychotherapy works via a short consultation was effective in strengthening treatment expectations and decision making in a nonharmful way. Further trials clarifying whether this effectively translates to better treatment outcomes are required. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译:

通过心理治疗的知情同意优化治疗预期和决策:一项随机对照试验。

目的 本研究的目的是确定优化知情同意 (OIC) 咨询心理治疗的有效性和安全性。方法 我们进行了一项随机对照优效性在线试验,包括 2 周的治疗和 3 个月的随访。对 122 名经结构化访谈证实患有精神障碍的成年人(平均年龄:32 岁,性别认同:51.6% 女性,1.6% 不同性别)进行随机分组。参与者收到了一份关于自学心理治疗的信息手册(照常治疗 [TAU];n = 61)或 TAU 加上单次 OIC,利用期望管理、情境化、框架和共同决策(n = 61)。主要结局是两周随访时的治疗预期。结果 在 2 周随访中,与仅接受 TAU 的参与者相比,接受 OIC 的参与者表现出更积极的治疗期望(平均差异:0.70,95% CI [0.36,1.04]),效果中等(d = 0.73)。同样,OIC 对动机(d = 0.74)和遵守意图(d = 0.46)产生积极影响。OIC 对减少决策冲突(d = 0.91)和增加知识(d = 0.93)产生了巨大影响。与 TAU 相比,接受 OIC 的参与者表现出更高的同意治疗能力 (d = 0.63) 和对收到的信息的更高满意度 (d = 1.34)。心理治疗的预期不良反应没有产生统计学上显着的组间差异。结果维持在 3 个月的随访中。n = 10 例 (8.2%) 的数据集缺失(评估后 n = 4、2 周 n = 6、3 个月随访 n = 8)。结论 通过简短的咨询向患者解释心理治疗如何发挥作用,可以有效地以无害的方式增强治疗期望和决策。需要进一步的试验来澄清这是否能有效转化为更好的治疗结果。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2023-11-16
down
wechat
bug