Reports an error in "In it together: Shared reality with instrumental others is linked to goal success" by Abdo Elnakouri, Maya Rossignac-Milon, Kori L. Krueger, Amanda L. Forest, E. Tory Higgins and Abigail A. Scholer (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Advanced Online Publication, Jul 13, 2023, np). In the original article, the abstract was revised. Specifically, there were errors in the the second and third sentences of the fifth paragraph of the Shared Reality section, fifth sentence of the Present Research section, An updated Figure 1 now appears in the erratum. NIO counterpart and and the specific note in Table 3, the first parenthetical text in the Procedure and Materials section in Study 2c, the phrase its NIO counterpart in the Discussion section of Study 2c, last sentence of the second paragraph of Study 3, third sentence in the third paragraph of Study 3, first sentence in the third paragraph of the Results section, the phrase their NIO counterparts in both the Self-Reported Goal Success and GPA sections of Study 4c, NIO counterpart and the specific note in Table 9, last phrase in the second paragraph in the Discussion section of Study 4, and the in-text citation of Footnote 9 in the Contribution to Understanding the Interpersonal Influences on Goal Success. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2023-89842-001). Why are some people more successful than others? In addition to individual factors (e.g. self-control), research has recently suggested that the quality of people's interpersonal relationships is crucial for success. Successful people do not just like and feel close to instrumental objects (e.g., study material, the gym), they also like and feel close to instrumental others (IOs; people who make goal success more likely). Yet instrumental people have one crucially distinct feature that instrumental objects do not: A mind of their own. We propose that while a growing body of work suggests that the sense of closeness to IOs (others who make goal success more likely) is crucial for goal success, prior work has not examined how the sense of the quality of people's relationships with IOs, and therefore goal success, likely depends on their ability to "merge minds" with them, experiencing both the goal and the world at large (i.e., shared reality) in the same way as one's IO contributes to goal success. Specifically, the present research (N = 1,326) explored (a) whether people experience shared reality-the perception of shared attitudes and judgments about the world-with IOs and (b) whether those who do so achieve greater goal success. Participants perceiving their romantic partner as instrumental for their goals experienced more shared reality with them (Study 1); participants also reported greater shared reality with IOs relative to noninstrumental others (NIO; Study 2). Higher shared reality with IOs was linked to more goal success initially, (Studies 2-4), 3-4 weeks later (Study 2c), and higher grade point averages (Study 4). These effects held when controlling for IO liking, closeness, epistemic trust, and NIO shared reality. Self-efficacy consistently mediated the effect of IO shared reality on goal success, indicating that IO shared reality may bolster people's epistemic confidence in their abilities. Overall, findings suggest that shared reality with IOs may play an important role in goal success. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

对 Elnakouri 等人的更正。（2023）。

报告了 Abdo Elnakouri、Maya Rossignac-Milon、Kori L. Krueger、Amanda L. Forest、E. Tory Higgins 和 Abigail A. Scholer 所著的“在一起：与有帮助的人共享现实与目标成功相关”中的错误（杂志）人格与社会心理学，高级在线出版物，2023 年 7 月 13 日，np）。原文章中，对摘要进行了修改。具体来说，共享现实部分第五段的第二句和第三句、当前研究部分的第五句存在错误，更新后的图 1 现在出现在勘误表中。NIO 对应项和表 3 中的具体注释、研究 2c 的程序和材料部分中的第一个括号文本、研究 2c 的讨论部分中的 NIO 对应项、研究 3 第二段的最后一句、第三句在研究 3 的第三段中，结果部分第三段的第一句中，研究 4c 的自我报告目标成功和 GPA 部分中的 NIO 对应短语、NIO 对应项以及表 9 中的具体注释，最后研究 4 讨论部分第二段中的短语，以及《理解人际对目标成功的影响的贡献》中脚注 9 的文内引用。（以下原始文章摘要出现在记录 2023-89842-001 中）。为什么有些人比其他人更成功？除了个人因素（例如自我控制）之外，最近的研究表明，人们的人际关系质量对于成功至关重要。成功的人不仅喜欢并感觉接近工具性物体（例如，学习材料、健身房），他们还喜欢并感觉接近工具性其他物体（IO；使目标更有可能成功的人）。然而，工具人有一个工具对象所没有的至关重要的特征：他们自己的思想。我们提出，虽然越来越多的研究表明，与 IO（使目标更有可能成功的其他人）的亲密感对于目标成功至关重要，但之前的工作并未研究人们与 IO 的关系质量的感觉如何，以及因此，目标的成功很可能取决于他们与目标“融合思想”的能力，体验目标和整个世界（即共享现实），就像一个人的IO有助于目标成功一样。具体而言，本研究（N = 1,326）探讨了（a）人们是否通过 IO 体验到共同的现实——对世界的共同态度和判断的感知；以及（b）这样做的人是否取得了更大的目标成功。认为自己的浪漫伴侣有助于实现目标的参与者体验到了与他们更多的共同现实（研究 1）；参与者还报告说，与非工具性其他人相比，IO 拥有更多的共同现实（NIO；研究 2）。与 IO 的更高共享现实最初与更多目标成功相关（研究 2-4），3-4 周后（研究 2c），平均绩点更高（研究 4）。当控制 IO 喜好、亲密程度、认知信任和 NIO 共享现实时，这些效应仍然存在。自我效能始终调节 IO 共享现实对目标成功的影响，表明 IO 共享现实可能会增强人们对其能力的认知信心。总体而言，研究结果表明，与信息办公室共享现实可能在目标成功中发挥重要作用。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA，保留所有权利）。