In the 1970s, and again in the 1990s, a controversy sparked at the University of Hawai'i and the surrounding community over the name of one of its campus buildings that was meant to honor Australian psychologist Stanley Porteus. Using archival evidence, this article draws on the voices of various community members to reconstruct this history. Spanning multiple decades and happening alongside other controversies such as those over race and intelligence research, as well as movements promoting Hawaiian rights and sovereignty, the case of Porteus Hall offers a unique look at the global impacts of settler-science and scientific racism. Community members touched on several complex issues of legacy, presentism, and settlement, including the meanings and consequences of racism. One of the salient points community members made was that, in addition to claims to land and lifestyle, settler-scientific figures like Porteus represented claims to knowledge over local people themselves. Presented here are potential processes of deliberation and decolonization centered on our practices of commemoration that can suggest paths to expanding psychology's epistemology and methodology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

以种族主义为基础：夏威夷大学波特斯大厅争议。

在 20 世纪 70 年代和 90 年代，夏威夷大学及周边社区因其一栋校园建筑的名称引发了一场争议，该建筑的名称是为了纪念澳大利亚心理学家斯坦利·波特乌斯 (Stanley Porteus)。本文利用档案证据，借鉴各种社区成员的声音来重建这段历史。波特斯·霍尔的案例跨越了数十年，与种族和情报研究等其他争议以及促进夏威夷权利和主权的运动一起发生，为我们提供了对定居者科学和科学种族主义对全球影响的独特视角。社区成员谈到了遗产、当下主义和解决等几个复杂的问题，包括种族主义的含义和后果。社区成员提出的要点之一是，除了对土地和生活方式的主张之外，像波特乌斯这样的定居者科学人物也代表了对当地人本身的了解的主张。这里介绍的是以我们的纪念实践为中心的潜在审议和非殖民化过程，可以为扩展心理学认识论和方法论提供建议。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA，保留所有权利）。