Although neither Sigmund Freud nor Jacques Lacan ever neglected the place of culture and the social field for the subject, they always opposed "culturalist" ideas, even when such ideas no longer used this label. It is important to examine what both of these figures said about culturalism, but it is just as pertinent to return to other criticisms of this movement, which developed in the United States during the last century, because at present this movement has returned covertly within French psychoanalysis. First, "culturalism" is neither a specifically American problem nor one that belongs to the past. Second, some decisive criticisms of this movement remain both germane and original: they are able to throw light on a theoretical current that, at least in France, now characterizes a dominant orientation of psychoanalytic work. Third, although Lacan himself foresaw it, the misuse of some of his notions has unexpectedly served as a Trojan horse that has enabled culturalism to return.

中文翻译：

---

拉康和文化主义：“不合时宜的”抵抗精神分析的编年史。

尽管西格蒙德·弗洛伊德和雅克·拉康都没有忽视主体的文化和社会场域的地位，但他们始终反对“文化主义”思想，即使这些思想不再使用这个标签。研究这两位人物对文化主义的看法很重要，但同样重要的是回到对上个世纪在美国发展起来的这一运动的其他批评，因为目前这一运动已经在法国秘密回归心理分析。首先，“文化主义”既不是美国特有的问题，也不是过去的问题。其次，对这一运动的一些决定性批评仍然是切题的和原创的：它们能够阐明一种理论潮流，至少在法国，这种理论潮流现在是精神分析工作的主导方向。