The study of measurement equivalence has important implications for organizational research. Nonequivalence across groups or over time can affect the results of a study and the conclusions that are drawn from it. As a result, the review paper by Vandenberg & Lance (2000) has been highly cited and has played an important role in understanding the measurement of organizational constructs. However, that paper is now 20 years old, and a number of advances have been made in the application and interpretation of measurement equivalence (ME) since its publication. Therefore, the goal of the present paper is to provide an updated review of ME techniques that describes recent advances in testing for ME and proposes a taxonomy of potential sources of nonequivalence. Finally, we articulate recommendations for applying these newer methods and consider future directions for measurement equivalence research in the organizational literature.

测量等效性的研究对组织研究具有重要意义。跨组或随时间推移的非对等性会影响研究结果和从中得出的结论。因此，Vandenberg & Lance (2000) 的综述论文被高度引用，并在理解组织结构的测量方面发挥了重要作用。然而，那篇论文现在已有 20 年的历史，自发表以来，在测量等效性 (ME) 的应用和解释方面取得了许多进展。因此，本文的目标是提供对 ME 技术的最新评论，该技术描述了 ME 测试的最新进展，并提出了潜在非等效性来源的分类法。最后，